Sex	Area of destination	Habitation of destination	Absolute value and percentage	period	Total
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2005	873.6
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2004	667.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2003	522.1
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2002	489.6
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2001	431.7
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2000	335.6
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	1999	299.8
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2005	196.7
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2004	183.4
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2003	130.7
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2002	112.9
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2001	121.7
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2000	77.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	1999	76.5
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2005	22.5
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2004	27.5
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2003	25.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2002	23.1
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2001	28.2
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2000	22.9
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	1999	25.5
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2005	676.9
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2004	483.6
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2003	391.4
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2002	376.7
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2001	310.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2000	258.6
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	1999	223.3
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2005	77.5
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2004	72.5
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2003	75.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2002	76.9
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2001	71.8
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2000	77.1
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	1999	74.5
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2005	86.7
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2004	41.5
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2003	30.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2002	33.1
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2001	29.5
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2000	26.3
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	1999	20.9
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2005	23.9
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2004	8.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2003	4.6
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2002	5.3
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2001	8.7
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2000	5.1
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	1999	4.2
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2005	27.5
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2004	19.2
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2003	15.4
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2002	15.9
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2001	29.7
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2000	19.2
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	1999	19.9
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2005	62.9
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2004	33.6
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2003	25.4
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2002	27.8
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2001	20.7
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2000	21.2
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	1999	16.8
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2005	72.5
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2004	80.8
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2003	84.6
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2002	84.1
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2001	70.3
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2000	80.8
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	1999	80.1
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2005	75.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2004	50.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2003	44.3
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2002	35.9
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2001	32.7
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2000	28.7
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	1999	30.5
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2005	23.6
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2004	19.6
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2003	20.8
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2002	6.3
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2001	5.8
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2000	7.0
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	1999	9.6
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2005	31.5
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2004	39.3
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2003	47.0
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2002	17.5
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2001	17.6
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2000	24.5
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	1999	31.4
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2005	51.4
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2004	30.3
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2003	23.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2002	29.7
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2001	26.9
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2000	21.6
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	1999	20.9
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2005	68.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2004	60.7
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2003	53.0
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2002	82.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2001	82.4
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2000	75.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	1999	68.6
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2005	103.9
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2004	62.7
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2003	57.8
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2002	33.9
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2001	86.7
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2000	31.9
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	1999	43.4
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2005	18.9
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2004	14.3
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2003	3.4
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2002	7.7
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2001	17.8
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2000	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	1999	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2005	18.2
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2004	22.9
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2003	5.8
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2002	22.6
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2001	20.6
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2000	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	1999	.
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2005	85.0
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2004	48.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2003	54.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2002	26.2
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2001	68.9
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2000	31.9
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	1999	43.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2005	81.8
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2004	77.1
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2003	94.2
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2002	77.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2001	79.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2005	114.8
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2004	92.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2003	69.7
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2002	62.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2001	45.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2000	49.1
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	1999	57.3
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2005	55.1
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2004	55.7
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2003	43.2
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2002	33.4
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2001	22.9
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2000	23.7
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	1999	27.3
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2005	48.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2004	60.5
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2003	62.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2002	53.9
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2001	51.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2000	48.3
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	1999	47.6
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2005	59.7
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2004	36.3
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2003	26.5
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2002	28.6
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2001	22.1
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2000	25.4
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	1999	30.0
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2005	52.0
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2004	39.5
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2003	38.0
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2002	46.1
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2001	49.0
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2000	51.7
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	1999	52.4
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2005	283.5
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2004	267.0
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2003	198.7
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2002	202.8
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2001	152.1
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2000	107.1
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	1999	88.8
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2005	36.1
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2004	54.0
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2003	27.0
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2002	45.7
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2001	41.6
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2000	16.1
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	1999	23.8
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2005	12.7
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2004	20.2
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2003	13.6
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2002	22.6
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2001	27.3
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2000	15.0
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	1999	26.8
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2005	247.4
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2004	213.0
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2003	171.7
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2002	157.1
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2001	110.5
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2000	91.0
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	1999	65.0
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2005	87.3
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2004	79.8
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2003	86.4
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2002	77.4
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2001	72.7
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2000	85.0
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	1999	73.2
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2005	163.5
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2004	128.3
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2003	68.5
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2002	85.8
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2001	56.4
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2000	70.3
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	1999	36.8
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2005	33.6
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2004	26.8
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2003	23.5
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2002	6.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2001	15.7
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2000	22.5
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	1999	7.1
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2005	20.5
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2004	20.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2003	34.3
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2002	8.0
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2001	27.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2000	32.0
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	1999	19.3
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2005	129.9
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2004	101.5
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2003	45.0
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2002	78.9
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2001	40.7
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2000	47.7
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	1999	29.7
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2005	79.5
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2004	79.1
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2003	65.7
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2002	92.0
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2001	72.1
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2000	68.0
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	1999	80.7
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2005	46.1
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2004	25.5
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2003	53.1
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2002	36.1
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2001	29.4
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2000	22.2
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	1999	22.1
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2005	5.5
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2004	4.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2003	8.2
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2002	7.7
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2001	9.1
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2000	2.6
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	1999	4.6
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2005	12.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2004	19.3
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2003	15.4
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2002	21.2
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2001	31.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2000	11.5
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	1999	20.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2005	40.5
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2004	20.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2003	44.9
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2002	28.5
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2001	20.3
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2000	19.7
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	1999	17.5
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2005	88.0
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2004	80.7
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2003	84.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2002	78.8
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2001	69.0
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2000	88.5
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	1999	79.4
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2005	439.0
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2004	331.2
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2003	257.5
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2002	248.8
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2001	228.7
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2000	175.0
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	1999	149.4
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2005	92.7
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2004	107.5
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2003	70.8
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2002	55.8
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2001	69.7
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2000	44.0
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	1999	38.3
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2005	21.1
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2004	32.5
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2003	27.5
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2002	22.4
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2001	30.5
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2000	25.1
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	1999	25.6
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2005	346.4
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2004	223.7
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2003	186.6
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2002	193.0
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2001	159.0
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2000	131.0
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	1999	111.2
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2005	78.9
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2004	67.5
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2003	72.5
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2002	77.6
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2001	69.5
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2000	74.9
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	1999	74.4
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2005	50.6
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2004	20.8
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2003	13.3
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2002	14.6
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2001	16.4
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2000	14.2
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	1999	10.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2005	13.5
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2004	5.4
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2003	1.5
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2002	2.5
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2001	4.9
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2000	2.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	1999	1.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2005	26.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2004	25.9
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2003	10.9
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2002	17.2
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2001	30.0
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2000	18.8
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	1999	16.6
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2005	37.1
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2004	15.4
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2003	11.9
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2002	12.1
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2001	11.5
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2000	11.5
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	1999	8.3
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2005	73.3
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2004	74.1
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2003	89.1
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2002	82.8
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2001	70.0
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2000	81.2
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	1999	83.4
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2005	31.7
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2004	24.4
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2003	21.7
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2002	16.9
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2001	18.5
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2000	10.9
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	1999	12.7
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2005	10.4
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2004	10.0
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2003	10.9
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2002	2.1
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2001	3.2
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2000	4.3
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	1999	4.7
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2005	32.8
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2004	41.1
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2003	50.2
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2002	12.6
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2001	17.1
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2000	39.6
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	1999	37.2
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2005	21.3
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2004	14.4
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2003	10.8
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2002	14.8
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2001	15.3
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2000	6.6
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	1999	8.0
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2005	67.2
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2004	58.9
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2003	49.8
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2002	87.4
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2001	82.9
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2000	60.4
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	1999	62.8
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2005	51.9
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2004	36.2
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2003	29.6
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2002	18.1
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2001	43.6
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2000	16.2
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	1999	26.5
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2005	6.5
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2004	14.3
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2003	3.4
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2002	5.4
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2001	10.1
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2000	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	1999	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2005	12.6
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2004	39.5
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2003	11.4
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2002	30.0
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2001	23.1
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2000	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	1999	.
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2005	45.4
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2004	21.9
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2003	26.2
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2002	12.7
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2001	33.5
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2000	16.2
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	1999	26.5
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2005	87.4
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2004	60.5
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2003	88.6
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2002	70.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2001	76.9
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2005	55.9
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2004	46.7
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2003	35.7
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2002	33.6
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2001	24.3
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2000	27.1
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	1999	28.9
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2005	27.4
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2004	27.6
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2003	22.3
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2002	19.0
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2001	13.1
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2000	14.2
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	1999	14.4
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2005	49.1
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2004	59.1
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2003	62.4
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2002	56.7
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2001	54.1
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2000	52.4
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	1999	49.7
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2005	28.5
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2004	19.1
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2003	13.4
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2002	14.5
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2001	11.2
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2000	12.9
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	1999	14.5
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2005	50.9
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2004	40.9
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2003	37.6
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2002	43.3
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2001	45.9
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2000	47.6
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	1999	50.3
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2005	146.0
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2004	128.3
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2003	102.3
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2002	108.2
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2001	73.9
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2000	58.1
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	1999	40.6
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2005	19.2
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2004	31.2
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2003	16.6
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2002	22.6
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2001	20.5
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2000	9.4
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	1999	10.4
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2005	13.1
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2004	24.4
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2003	16.2
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2002	20.9
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2001	27.7
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2000	16.1
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	1999	25.6
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2005	126.9
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2004	97.0
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2003	85.7
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2002	85.6
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2001	53.4
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2000	48.7
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	1999	30.2
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2005	86.9
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2004	75.6
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2003	83.8
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2002	79.1
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2001	72.3
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2000	83.9
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	1999	74.4
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2005	81.3
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2004	61.8
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2003	30.8
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2002	42.6
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2001	35.4
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2000	37.2
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	1999	19.1
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2005	14.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2004	15.7
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2003	13.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2002	1.9
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2001	12.5
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2000	12.5
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	1999	3.4
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2005	17.3
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2004	25.4
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2003	42.2
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2002	4.4
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2001	35.3
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2000	33.6
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	1999	18.0
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2005	67.3
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2004	46.1
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2003	17.8
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2002	40.8
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2001	22.9
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2000	24.7
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	1999	15.6
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2005	82.7
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2004	74.6
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2003	57.8
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2002	95.6
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2001	64.7
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2000	66.4
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	1999	82.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2005	21.6
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2004	13.1
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2003	24.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2002	14.8
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2001	16.6
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2000	11.2
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	1999	11.7
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2005	1.6
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2004	3.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2003	3.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2002	2.3
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2001	5.5
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2000	0.9
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	1999	3.7
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2005	7.7
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2004	24.3
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2003	13.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2002	15.3
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2001	32.9
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2000	8.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	1999	31.5
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2005	19.9
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2004	9.9
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2003	20.9
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2002	12.5
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2001	11.1
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2000	10.3
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	1999	8.0
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2005	92.3
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2004	75.7
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2003	86.8
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2002	84.7
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2001	67.1
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2000	91.8
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	1999	68.5
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2005	434.5
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2004	335.7
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2003	264.7
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2002	240.8
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2001	202.9
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2000	160.6
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	1999	150.4
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2005	104.0
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2004	75.9
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2003	59.9
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2002	57.1
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2001	51.9
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2000	33.0
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	1999	38.2
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2005	23.9
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2004	22.6
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2003	22.6
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2002	23.7
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2001	25.6
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2000	20.6
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	1999	25.4
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2005	330.5
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2004	259.9
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2003	204.8
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2002	183.7
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2001	151.0
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2000	127.6
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	1999	112.2
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2005	76.1
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2004	77.4
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2003	77.4
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2002	76.3
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2001	74.4
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2000	79.4
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	1999	74.6
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2005	36.2
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2004	20.8
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2003	16.7
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2002	18.5
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2001	13.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2000	12.1
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	1999	10.9
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2005	10.4
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2004	2.6
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2003	3.2
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2002	2.8
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2001	3.8
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2000	2.4
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	1999	2.5
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2005	28.7
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2004	12.6
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2003	19.0
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2002	14.9
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2001	29.3
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2000	19.7
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	1999	22.9
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2005	25.8
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2004	18.2
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2003	13.5
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2002	15.7
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2001	9.2
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2000	9.7
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	1999	8.4
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2005	71.3
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2004	87.4
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2003	81.0
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2002	85.1
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2001	70.7
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2000	80.3
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	1999	77.1
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2005	43.3
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2004	25.5
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2003	22.7
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2002	19.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2001	14.2
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2000	17.8
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	1999	17.7
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2005	13.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2004	9.6
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2003	10.0
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2002	4.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2001	2.6
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2000	2.7
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	1999	4.8
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2005	30.4
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2004	37.6
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2003	44.0
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2002	21.8
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2001	18.4
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2000	15.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	1999	27.3
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2005	30.1
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2004	15.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2003	12.7
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2002	14.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2001	11.6
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2000	15.1
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	1999	12.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2005	69.6
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2004	62.4
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2003	56.0
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2002	78.2
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2001	81.6
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2000	84.8
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	1999	72.7
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2005	52.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2004	26.5
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2003	28.2
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2002	15.8
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2001	43.1
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2000	15.7
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	1999	17.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2005	12.4
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2004	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2003	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2002	2.2
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2001	7.8
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2000	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	1999	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2005	23.8
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2004	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2003	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2002	14.1
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2001	18.0
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2000	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	1999	.
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2005	39.6
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2004	26.5
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2003	28.2
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2002	13.6
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2001	35.3
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2000	15.7
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	1999	17.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2005	76.2
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2002	85.9
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2001	82.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2005	58.9
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2004	45.3
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2003	34.0
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2002	28.4
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2001	20.7
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2000	22.0
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	1999	28.4
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2005	27.7
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2004	28.1
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2003	20.9
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2002	14.4
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2001	9.8
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2000	9.6
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	1999	12.9
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2005	47.0
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2004	61.9
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2003	61.5
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2002	50.6
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2001	47.3
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2000	43.4
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	1999	45.5
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2005	31.3
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2004	17.3
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2003	13.1
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2002	14.0
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2001	10.9
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2000	12.5
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	1999	15.4
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2005	53.0
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2004	38.1
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2003	38.5
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2002	49.4
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2001	52.7
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2000	56.6
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	1999	54.5
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2005	137.4
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2004	138.7
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2003	96.4
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2002	94.6
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2001	78.2
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2000	49.0
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	1999	48.2
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2005	16.9
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2004	22.8
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2003	10.4
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2002	23.2
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2001	21.1
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2000	6.7
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	1999	13.4
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2005	12.3
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2004	16.4
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2003	10.8
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2002	24.5
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2001	27.0
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2000	13.7
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	1999	27.7
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2005	120.5
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2004	115.9
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2003	86.0
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2002	71.5
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2001	57.1
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2000	42.3
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	1999	34.8
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2005	87.7
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2004	83.6
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2003	89.2
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2002	75.5
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2001	73.0
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2000	86.3
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	1999	72.3
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2005	82.2
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2004	66.5
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2003	37.7
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2002	43.2
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2001	21.0
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2000	33.0
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	1999	17.7
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2005	19.5
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2004	11.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2003	10.5
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2002	5.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2001	3.2
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2000	10.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	1999	3.7
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2005	23.8
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2004	16.6
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2003	27.8
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2002	11.7
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2001	15.5
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2000	30.3
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	1999	20.8
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2005	62.6
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2004	55.4
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2003	27.2
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2002	38.1
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2001	17.8
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2000	23.0
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	1999	14.1
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2005	76.2
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2004	83.4
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2003	72.2
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2002	88.3
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2001	84.5
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2000	69.7
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	1999	79.2
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2005	24.5
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2004	12.4
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2003	29.1
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2002	21.3
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2001	12.7
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2000	11.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	1999	10.4
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2005	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2004	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2003	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2002	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2001	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2000	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	1999	100.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2005	3.9
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2004	1.7
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2003	5.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2002	5.4
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2001	3.6
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2000	1.6
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	1999	0.9
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2005	15.8
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2004	14.1
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2003	17.2
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2002	25.3
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2001	28.5
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2000	14.9
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	1999	8.3
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2005	20.6
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2004	10.7
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2003	24.1
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2002	15.9
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2001	9.1
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2000	9.4
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	1999	9.5
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2005	84.2
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2004	85.9
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2003	82.8
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2002	74.7
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2001	71.5
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2000	85.1
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	1999	91.7